beneficial to law enforcement officers
Body armor is a vital safety gear for police officers. While there’s no such thing as bullet proof armor, protective body armor can adequately protect officers against most types of rifle and handgun ammo. The material is usually made of thick, durable nylon, and is stretchy and lightweight enough to fit the officers’ build. It also has many pockets designed to hold various accessories such as batons, flashlights, first aid kits, and other items that could save an officer’s life. This article will describe what Body Armor is, where it comes from, and how it can be beneficial to law enforcement officers.
Nylon is one of the most common materials used in body armor. When manufactured, the material is twisted and folded several times, creating a kind of bulletproof membrane. This construction allows the body armor to create a tight seal with the wearer’s skin, which reduces the amount of friction that may increase the chance of a dispersing bullet.
Ineffective personal protection equipment
The purpose of body armor isn’t so much to protect police officers personal protection while on the job, but rather to decrease the risk of injury from firearms. Ineffective personal protection equipment (bulletproof vests, batons, night vision goggles, and other similar items) simply don’t work as well as a properly designed system. Less than one percent of law enforcement officers use firearms on the job and those who do often have very poor shooting skills. Body armor not only reduces the risk of injury to officers, but it can also decrease the risk to other citizens.
Body armor was once only available in larger caliber firearms
There are two primary reasons that bulletproof vests and other similar items are important to law enforcement officers: to protect their life and to protect the lives of their fellow officers. Since law enforcement officers are placed in potentially hazardous situations daily, they need to have the highest possible level of protection. However, there is some controversy surrounding whether or not police officers should be required to wear body armor. Many police departments have a policy of not requesting personnel armor items, claiming that they can ill treat their officers and create unnecessary tension in the workplace. Opponents of requiring police officers to wear body armor claim that police officers already have enough stress due to other demanding jobs and that giving them additional stress over a legal requirement (the wearing of bulletproof vests) is unnecessary.
But through technological advances in recent years, small arms can now be used for defense as well. Smaller handguns provide law enforcement officers with the same level of protection from handguns that they would receive from firearms. In fact, many argue that there is little difference between using a handgun to defend oneself against a criminal and using a small arms cartridge against a criminal’s gun. The real issue, many argue, is not the size of the weapon, but rather the effectiveness of the defense tool. Although it is impossible to give police officers an exact comparison, many argue that neither a large gun nor a small pistol can ever truly be considered a weapon because it lacks any type of muzzle energy.
In response to this argument, manufacturers of body armor have designed a new type of defense mechanisms called “bulletproof vests.” These vests are still not able to stop all bullets, but they do provide law enforcement agencies and other first responders with much needed protection from firearms and other lethal force attacks. Since there are currently no laws mandating the carrying of body armor by police officers across the United States, it is up to the discretion of each individual officer to decide whether or not he feels his safety is threatened by his own weapon. Each state may have slightly different definitions, but ultimately it is up to the individual police officer to decide if he feels he is justified in the use of deadly force against a potential attacker.